déjà voters all over again

Our quadrennial presidential tournament was playing out like the normal boring political cage match six months ago. While the smart money remains on the choices of the major party elite, things are getting interesting here on the eve of the Iowa Caucus.

The latest polls show the competition is fierce. Or not. Never one to trust polls, I instead rely on direct observation and clearly the gladiators know this will be a battle not an anointing. This is good news because watching otherwise intelligent people defend Hilary and The Donald is better than Super Bowl commercials. But sadly no more substantive.

This is all very entertaining for those of us excluded from the process.

I wish the headlines shocked me. “As Trump and Cruz Soar, G.O.P. Leaders’ Alarm Grows”, and “Two Hired Guns for Clinton and Sanders in Iowa Showdown” are the policy bereft lead stories for the New York Times as I write. Apparently, actual statements of policy greater than tweet-sized are the sole province of the Brookings or Cato ivory towers. Cheering Americans are again lining up on the Democratic or AFC sidelines to watch our gladiators throw down.

It’s déjà voters all over again.

Legislation has infamously been compared to sausage making. Politicians suggest that citizens do not really want to see how it is done, but it is clear that ugliness doesn’t bothers Americans—indeed, they love their politics grisly. Though often lacking even a fundamental understanding of the issues, they viscerally discern that too much unlabeled pork is making it into the all-beef sausage.

Money trumps our high ideals every time.

On a good election day, roughly 50% of Americans sleep in rather than go to the polls. I am convinced that they find the uncompromising dysfunction of government simply exhausting. Why bother when authentic change cannot rationally be anticipated from the limited choices on their ballots? They feel disenfranchised, not apathetic.

But there is a hint this year—just a hint—that change may be in the air. “Outsiders” like Bernie Sander and Donald Trump are, if you are the sort that pays attention to polls, encroaching on the anointed of the political machines.

And now, we hear Michael Bloomberg may toss his hat (and his billions) into the ring. Just when I thought I’d seen everything now that a barrel of oil costs less than a salmon, we may have a socialist, a megalomaniac and a bizillionaire moderate vying for the oval office.

A moneyed non-partisan might just have a shot in this strange brew.

Don’t worry: I’m not getting my hopes up. The partisan drums beat loudly and the American voters will, as is their tradition, respond. Pundits are already churning out analysis of whether Bloomberg would hurt the Reds or the Blues more.

Perhaps Bloomberg is just what is needed to shake up the ruling class and get We the People out its two-party malaise. I do not yet know if Bloomberg is someone I can get behind or not. But I do know that the over-sleeping 50% are a reservoir waiting to be tapped. For the first time in a very long time, there is the possibility of an authentic change agent on the ballot. Perhaps I too will set my alarm early on November 8th.

But don’t hold your breath.


4 thoughts on “déjà voters all over again”

  1. Hahaha! Good to see you again Prof!

    Well we at least we agree on this: this bunch of candidates look more like an SNL casting call than a presidential election.

    But I take it that you think my cautious optimism over Bloomberg is unwarranted? I’m just looking for someone to shake thing up enough to break the two-party stranglehold on the American psyche.


    1. Although there is some merit in independents and oddities outside of the establishment’s direct control, given Bloomberg’s agenda is mainstream statist and the establishment (I assume) controls much of the “presidential advisers” that the executive relies upon at briefings and such, the effect upon policy and us would be nil, I wouldn’t consider a Bloomberg or Trump win a gotcha against the entrenched nonsense in DC per se. But the DNC & GOP leaders would just pow wow more on how to shut the doors on independents. The putrid actions of the GOP against Ron Paul in 2012 and at the convention were just such an action.


      1. I think we are pretty much in agreement here, Prof. The only way I see even a dent in the establishment is if we get the unlikely three way of Trump v. Sanders v. Bloomberg. The establishment will certainly react, but the craziness of such an election might wake voters up to the understanding that they do have power if they will not waste their votes on Democrats and Republicans. But it will take a serious surge of voter participation offset the establishment backlash and I don’t sense that such a rebellion is in the works.


  2. Now that I have honed and defined my political position quite narrow and out of the mainstream, I am ashamed that I vacillate between not caring and wondering if I should make a protest or damage control vote. Social media wise, I’m just having fun figuratively throwing banana peels into the path of candidates by pointing how their wrong ideas, policy positions, and past errors. It is amazing to me that the best we can do is the current crop of Dems & Repubs. But candidates for office do not represent the best minds and character. They represent people who seek disproportionate power to implement change. People sometimes forget that the altruism “power corrupts” is universal and not party specific. Can I ever tame the cynic in me?

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s